Films haven’t always been obsessed with sex and its mechanics. In fact, before the pornographic film industry exploded, sexuality was a reality veiled or left unexplored on celluloid.
Before the 1970s, films portrayed sex in two major streams.
In the B-grade picture world – the drive-ins and the midnight movie theatres – exploitation was the dominant methodology. Here in a world driven by excessive gore (cannibalism in Blood Feast) and bizarre sexuality (transgenderism in Glen or Glenda), the sight of bare flesh was seen as an added bonus for patrons. If they were lucky, the director even managed to coax an intimate scene out of the actors. These films exploited nudity and sex for the sake of an audience hungry for sensationalism and something “new”.
However, in the midst of this perverse and questionable subculture, many directors were exploring sex in intelligent yet provocative ways.
Scenes of physical intimacy in 60s cinema had become a vehicle for deeper portrayals of human eroticism and personal drive. Sex was no longer something to be viewed independent of the emotional and physical person; the human was seen to be a wholistic creation. One example of this was within Luis Bunuel’s “Belle de Jour”. A woman is placed in centre-stage (played by Catherine Deneuve), whose empty, passionless matrimony has led her to seek fulfilment as a prostitute. It was both a goad to a potentially prudish public, and a questioning voice against sexless marriages.
However, no director placed the microscope over the complexity and messiness of our sexual lives like Michaelangelo Antonioni. In his early masterpiece, “L’Avventura” (pictured below), sex becomes one of the major diagonostic tools for understanding his characters’ drives and desires. Ultimately, what is uncovered in the lives of the rich, by their hunger for physical intimacy, is a troubling spiritual malaise and yearning for deeper fulfilment. The coda to his oblique “L’Eclisse” merely serves to deepen this questioning of human behaviour. Sadly Antonioni would abandon these careful explorations of sexuality for a more fashionable and superficial tone in later films (Blow Up).
Like his fellow Italian, Federico Fellini sought to interrogate the upper class and their meaningless search for happiness through sex in “La Dolce Vita” (The Sweet Life). He loads the frame with visual stimulus and asks us in the audience, “isn’t this what you want as well?”, while simultaneously showing us the empty outcome of these things. While it lacks the intellectual rigour and surgical analysis of Antonioni, it still raises an empathetic yet interrogative voice to the viewer.
Both Antonioni and Fellini managed to do all this without explicitly filming a ‘scene’ between his performers. Rather, everything was in the realm of suggestion.
However, it would be films like “Blow Up”, “The Graduate” and the never-ending proliferation of James Bond titles which would provide an omen of things to come. Here the intimate act was merely a commodity to be used up without concern; sex and nudity were administered as a stimulant for a bored and anesthetised audience. Nevertheless, a minority of films would travel upon the intelligent and sometimes responsible path which had begun to be paved.
